This chapter begins by explaining how health and safety statutes intend for agencies to make regulatory decisions. It then discusses how traditional cost-benefit analysis distorts such deliberations. It presents a case study—the Environmental Protection Agency's excessively delayed rulemaking on controlling mercury emissions from power plants—to illustrate the distinctions between the two approaches. It concludes with an evaluation of the prospects for reform.
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.