This book argues that while Court Holding and Cumberland seem confusing and irreconcilable on their face, the cases are in fact wholly predicable if important factors are taken into account, namely the existence of wartime conditions. It tries to convince readers that the justices use cases such as Court Holding and Cumberland to advance not only their own, but also the nation's goals. The thesis of the book is that Supreme Court justices hold an implicit power of the purse, a power that can be used to realize extralegal and budget-related objectives. It sets forth an information theory of crisis jurisprudence. In addition, it expects federal judges to respond to foreign policy crises in a way that differs from the decision making that transpires in periods of domestic disorder and peacetime generally. Finally, an overview of the chapters included in this book is given.
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.