Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Behind Closed DoorsIRBs and the Making of Ethical Research$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Laura Stark

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780226770864

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226770888.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 27 May 2022

Documents and Deliberations: An Anticipatory Perspective

Documents and Deliberations: An Anticipatory Perspective

Chapter:
(p.57) Three Documents and Deliberations: An Anticipatory Perspective
Source:
Behind Closed Doors
Author(s):

Laura Stark

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226770888.003.0004

This chapter focuses on the documentation of the decision making process of institutional review boards (IRBs). It examines the ethics review of two studies and looks at decisions both as they took place over time and as these events were formally documented afterward. It suggests that these meetings portrayed the IRBs as unitary social actors who evaluated studies, and highlights the individual board members' successful attempts at consensus-building during board deliberations.

Keywords:   IRB meeting, decision making process, documentation, unitary social actors, consensus-building

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.