Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Expert Witness in Islamic CourtsMedicine and Crafts in the Service of Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ron Shaham

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780226749334

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226749358.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 19 September 2021

Between a Witness, a Reporter, and a Judge: The Probative Status of the Expert

Between a Witness, a Reporter, and a Judge: The Probative Status of the Expert

Chapter:
(p.27) Chapter One Between a Witness, a Reporter, and a Judge: The Probative Status of the Expert
Source:
The Expert Witness in Islamic Courts
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226749358.003.0002

Because of its casuistic nature, Islamic fiqh does not have a general theory of evidence in general and of expert witnessing in particular. However, there are discussions on the rules of expert witnessing and reporting in treaties of jurisprudence and applied law. This article analyzes the juristic discourse with regard to the probative value of expert testimony. It focuses on the “inner” world of the law, that is, the discourse of jurists by which they create significance for social experiences. Drawing on classical legal sources, the article follows the discourse of the ulama on the probative value of expert testimony. Jurists disagree on whether expert opinion is a standard testimony or a report. This question has important implications for the qualifications required of expert witnesses, their position in relation to the judge and the litigants, the procedures by which experts deliver their opinion in court, the number of experts required for each legal case, and the probative value of the expert's opinion. The article also looks at female experts such as midwives, who testify without corresponding male testimony.

Keywords:   expert witnesses, fiqh, evidence, probative value, ulama, female experts, report, juristic discourse

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.