In this chapter, we will deal with two predominant modes of legal interpretation—namely, textualism and purposivism. These two modes seem to recur frequently across many different national and international legal regimes. The inquiry here will focus on the stylized challenges and problems that arise within each mode of interpretation. Such an “intramodal” focus presumes the interpreter is already committed to a particular mode of interpretation rather than having to decide between different modes of interpretation (the “inter-modal”). The focus on the intra-modal allows the identification of the stereotyped decision-points that a judge or lawyer confronts when practicing a particular mode of interpretation.
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.