Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
States of Exception in American History$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gary Gerstle and Joel Isaac

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9780226712291

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2021

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226712468.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 27 May 2022

Negotiating the Rule of Law: Dilemmas of Security and Liberty Revisited

Negotiating the Rule of Law: Dilemmas of Security and Liberty Revisited

Chapter:
(p.39) 2 Negotiating the Rule of Law: Dilemmas of Security and Liberty Revisited
Source:
States of Exception in American History
Author(s):

Ewa Atanassow

Ira Katznelson

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226712468.003.0003

Responding to Carl Schmitt’s critique of liberal democracy an important group of American political scientists in the 1930s and 1940s sought to address exigencies without compromising liberal principles, including respect for individual rights and the rule of law. They elaborated a liberal response to emergency that sanctioned departures from the rule of law only for strictly defined purposes and a limited period. This moment, we argue, when emergency powers could have clear limits, has passed. The invention and dissemination of atomic weapons, the Cold War, and the War on Terror, together with the deepening and increasing entrenchment of the security state, make that limited and strictly temporal approach to emergency no longer adequate. With the return of Schmitt’s challenge, it is imperative to think afresh about how liberalism might deal with security while staying true to itself. The essay draws on the wellsprings of political liberalism, many of whose central figures recognized the abiding need for prerogative power. Revisiting their proposed ways to reconcile a strong executive with the rule of law, we advocate an institutional imagination and identify models, such as the UK’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal, that, together, might serve us as the Roman model served our predecessors.

Keywords:   liberalism, rule of law, emergency powers, dictatorship

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.