Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Democracy DeclinedThe Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mallory E. SoRelle

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9780226711652

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2021

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226711829.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 19 September 2021

Democratization and Its Discontents: Demobilizing Marginalized Borrowers

Democratization and Its Discontents: Demobilizing Marginalized Borrowers

Chapter:
(p.150) 5 Democratization and Its Discontents: Demobilizing Marginalized Borrowers
Source:
Democracy Declined
Author(s):

Mallory E. SoRelle

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226711829.003.0005

Chapter five, Democratization and its Discontents: Demobilizing Marginalized Borrowers, investigates the political development of the so-called democratization of credit—which expanded access to credit to women, communities of color, and lower-income borrowers—and the political consequences for these historically marginalized groups. The chapter contends that the expansion of consumer financing is a natural outgrowth of the political economy of credit, and it produces the same policy feedback effects for historically marginalized borrowers that have de-politicized their mainstream peers. Chapter five draws on original survey data to demonstrate how marginalized borrowers subsequently experienced the privatizing and personalizing effects of consumer financial protections, resulting in diminished political engagement. While all groups of borrowers are beset by these demobilizing effects, they are especially consequential for those whose race, gender, and/or socioeconomic status puts them at greater risk of predatory lending practices in the first place. The chapter finds, however, that the degree to which marginalized borrowers place greater relative blame on market versus government actors is smaller, increasing the chance that these groups will respond to advocacy appeals for political action to combat predatory lending.

Keywords:   democratization of credit, low-income, race, gender, socioeconomic status, policy feedback, advocacy, political engagement, predatory lending, consumer financial protection

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.