Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Democracy DeclinedThe Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mallory E. SoRelle

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9780226711652

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2021

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226711829.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 17 September 2021

“Storming Mad” but Staying Home: Depoliticizing the American Borrower

“Storming Mad” but Staying Home: Depoliticizing the American Borrower

Chapter:
(p.72) 3 “Storming Mad” but Staying Home: Depoliticizing the American Borrower
Source:
Democracy Declined
Author(s):

Mallory E. SoRelle

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226711829.003.0003

Chapter three, “Storming Mad” but Staying Home: Depoliticizing the American Borrower, asks why borrowers have largely avoided political avenues when addressing their growing dissatisfaction with consumer financial protection and predatory lending. The chapter argues that borrowers’ strategies for addressing the issue of consumer financial protection are shaped by their experiences with the policies at the heart of the political economy of credit. Drawing on original survey data, this chapter demonstrates how information disclosures produce policy feedback effects that both privatize and personalize the practice of consumer borrowing in the United States. The result is that people place more blame for both individual and systemic lending problems on market actors—including both borrowers and lenders—than on political actors. In turn, angry borrowers try to solve their problems by engaging with banks and trade associations instead of demanding that policymakers enact stronger financial regulations.

Keywords:   predatory lending, credit, consumer financial protection, political economy, political engagement, policy feedback, financial regulation, survey

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.