Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Two Thumbs UpHow Critics Aid Appreciation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Stephanie Ross

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9780226064284

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2021

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226705033.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 27 September 2021

Identifying Critics

Identifying Critics

Chapter:
(p.83) 4. Identifying Critics
Source:
Two Thumbs Up
Author(s):

Stephanie Ross

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226705033.003.0005

I begin by taking up this central question about Humean critics: are they real, i.e., actual beings amongst us, or are they ideal, i.e., mere models that we strive to approximate? I construct an argument for the reality of ideal critics based on the Humean traits of practice and comparison. I next consider the nature of such individuals and ask how we can identify the ideal critics in our midst. Both Hume and his contemporary commentators appeal to the test of time to aid with this task. This test identifies a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for being an ideal critic, as many who are not discerning admire great works from the past. The key question here is how much the future resembles the past. That is, in what ways, if any, do new works that we ought to admire resemble the earlier works that rightly earned our appreciation? I examine a pair of historical theories of art—proposed by Jerrold Levinson and Noel Carroll—that attempt to bridge this gap. I draw morals from both versions, though an additional principle, based on J.S. Mill’s treatment of higher vs. lower pleasures, is required to activate this solution.

Keywords:   practice, comparison, test of time, problem of projection, historical theory of art, Millian principle

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.