Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Community Built on WordsThe Constitution in History and Politics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

H. Jefferson Powell

Print publication date: 2002

Print ISBN-13: 9780226677231

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226677224.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 30 March 2020

1798 (1): Justice Paterson and the Missing Fundamental Principle

1798 (1): Justice Paterson and the Missing Fundamental Principle

Chapter:
V. 1798 (1): Justice Paterson and the Missing Fundamental Principle
Source:
A Community Built on Words
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226677224.003.0006

Justice William Paterson was one of the most active and influential members of the Philadelphia convention that framed the Constitution, and the reference to his ardent desire “to have extended the provision” presumably alludes to his agreement with Dickinson, Gerry, and others who unsuccessfully sought to ensure that the Constitution banned retrospective legislation on civil as well as criminal matters. Paterson's construction of the clauses in Calder v. Bull thus contradicted what he thought the Constitution should have provided. Why Paterson did not come to the opposite conclusion, that the Constitution means what in his view it ought to mean—given the fact that doing so would have been entirely possible. In his opinion, Paterson argued that the ex post facto clause of Article I, section 10 ought to be read as limited to criminal matters because if it extended to civil laws the following clause, prohibiting state interference with the obligation of contracts, would be rendered superfluous.

Keywords:   Justice William Paterson, Philadelphia convention, Constitution, legislation, Calder v. Bull, civil laws, state interference

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.