Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A Community Built on WordsThe Constitution in History and Politics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

H. Jefferson Powell

Print publication date: 2002

Print ISBN-13: 9780226677231

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226677224.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 26 May 2022

1794: Kamper v. Hawkins and the Role of the Judiciary

1794: Kamper v. Hawkins and the Role of the Judiciary

(p.38) IV. 1794: Kamper v. Hawkins and the Role of the Judiciary
A Community Built on Words
University of Chicago Press

The claim that courts have the power to disregard or annul a statute if, in the court's opinion, it violates the Constitution was flatly contrary to mainstream English legal thought in the late eighteenth century. In contrast, during the last decade of the eighteenth century American lawyers, judges, and (what is most remarkable) legislators alike came to agree, almost universally, that some form of judicial review was a feature of the American constitutional order. By the time John Marshall had the opportunity to discuss the issue in Marbury v. Madison, the issue was essentially settled and Marshall's discussion of it evoked virtually no attention. (The modern legend that Marbury invented judicial review is simply that—a legend.) Marshall, to his credit, did not pretend that he was making a radical or innovative claim. The issue, he wrote, while “deeply interesting to the United States,” is “happily, not of an intricacy proportioned to its interest.” The issue, indeed, had arisen earlier in his home state of Virginia, and in one instance, the 1794 case of Kamper v. Hawkins, an able court gave it considered attention, with interesting results.

Keywords:   Kamper v. Hawkins, judiciary, Constitution, judicial review, constitutional order, Constitution

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.