Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Being Me Being YouAdam Smith and Empathy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Samuel Fleischacker

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780226661759

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2020

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226661926.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 24 September 2021

Empathy and the Limits of Utilitarianism (II)

Empathy and the Limits of Utilitarianism (II)

Chapter:
(p.128) 8 Empathy and the Limits of Utilitarianism (II)
Source:
Being Me Being You
Author(s):

Samuel Fleischacker

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226661926.003.0008

Joshua Greene and Jonathan Haidt have proposed that utilitarianism provides us with the common moral currency that every pluralistic society needs for public discourse. This chapter argues that utilitarianism cannot in fact supply such a currency, but Smithian empathy can. The weaknesses of utilitarianism are surveyed, especially its elitist qualities and its inability to spell out, in a plausible yet substantive manner, what counts as “happiness.” Smithian empathy, because it enables us to enter everyone else’s perspective, can give us a much deeper understanding of the human good. Empathy can thus do crucial moral work for us that the utilitarian calculus cannot. This is its deepest moral function. It cannot alone provide us with an adequate moral or political view, but it plays an irreplaceable role in providing the starting points for such views. A procedural common moral currency which defines goods and harms via fair, rational, and empathetic discourse among all citizens—modeled in part on Jürgen Habermas’s discourse ethics—is proposed in place of the utilitarian calculus.

Keywords:   Joshua Greene, Jonathan Haidt, discourse ethics, utilitarianism, Jürgen Habermas, public policy, happiness, empathy

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.