Voice Gap Crack Break
Voice Gap Crack Break
This chapter explores the gulf between vocal practices and vocal theory as condensed in the theoretical problem of the gap. For Lacanians Mladen Dolar and Slavoj Žizek, the gap is a key construct relative to voice, added to Freudian objects of the drive. What sets voice apart from Freud’s objects is that it loops out of a predetermined causal nexus and signifying chain, leaving a void in meaning and language and creating an irreparable gash in desire. Where Lacanians would understand voice as neither tangible nor perceptible or musical, this chapter hears voice as all three by listening to pressure put on the gap by classical and jazz singing voices that make perspicuous and material their own uncanny means of mechanical operation, especially via the “vocal break.” Prominent is Nina Simone, who lived dangerously in racialized spaces where vulnerability and risk are all-important. Looping in and out of signification, practices like hers expose the gap between signification and its lack while counting on listeners to invest in the performer's aleatory risk-taking. The chapter ends by offering a theory of voice that explains how relations between voice and performance, risk and (re)investment, operate with respect to language, musicality, intentionality, and signification.
Keywords: voice, gap, Mladen Dolar, Jacques Lacan, Nina Simone, vocal break, transactionality, risk, race object voice
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.