Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Maimonides' "Guide of the Perplexed" in TranslationA History from the Thirteenth Century to the Twentieth$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Josef Stern, James T. Robinson, and Yonatan Shemesh

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780226457635

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2020

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226627878.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 24 July 2021

Shlomo Pines and the Rediscovery of Maimonides in Contemporary Philosophy

Shlomo Pines and the Rediscovery of Maimonides in Contemporary Philosophy

Chapter:
(p.385) 14 Shlomo Pines and the Rediscovery of Maimonides in Contemporary Philosophy
Source:
Maimonides' "Guide of the Perplexed" in Translation
Author(s):

Kenneth Seeskin

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226627878.003.0015

This chapter explores the connection between the publication of Shlomo Pines’ English translation of the Guide of the Perplexed and what the author calls the ‘rediscovery’ of Maimonides by contemporary philosophers. After the publication of Pines’ translation in 1963, the sheer number of papers and books on Maimonides in English by Anglo-American philosophers increased dramatically. These contemporary scholars include not only historians of philosophy and of Jewish philosophy but also constructive theologians, and, as the author argues, philosophers of language. The chapter begins by distinguishing three major approaches to the study of Maimonides in America and Israel, and the role of Maimonides in recent developments in the history of medieval philosophy. It continues by discussing recent Anglo-American interest in Maimonides’ skepticism, negative theology, and account of divine attributes and names. In particular, the author explores parallels between Maimonides' understanding of the Tetragrammaton and Saul Kripke’s causal theory of reference. The paper also addresses Pines' introductory essay to his translation and his supposed change of views from 1979 on. Finally, the chapter discusses Leo Strauss’ role in the ‘rediscovery’ of Maimonides and his esotericist approach to the Guide.

Keywords:   Shlomo Pines, Anglo-American philosophy, negative theology, skepticism, Saul Kripke’s causal theory of reference, Leo Strauss, divine attributes and names

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.