Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
HomeschoolingThe History and Philosophy of a Controversial Practice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

James G. Dwyer and Shawn F. Peters

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780226627113

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2021

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226627397.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 07 December 2021

Common Themes and Disparate Concerns

Common Themes and Disparate Concerns

Chapter:
(p.108) Chapter Four Common Themes and Disparate Concerns
Source:
Homeschooling
Author(s):

James G. Dwyer

Shawn F. Peters

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226627397.003.0005

Parents choose homeschooling for a great variety of reasons, but a significant feature of homeschooling in the United States today is that nearly all parents who do it judge it to be superior to the schooling that the state offers to all children free of tuition, and even superior to any available private school options. At this point in the book, we switch gears to the normative, philosophical analysis of homeschooling and of the laws now governing it, with the historical background in mind. We now ask what stance the state ought to take toward some parents’ desire to keep children at home rather than sending them out to school. Is the current legal regime morally appropriate? Are parents morally entitled to this power over their children’s intellectual formation, even if not constitutionally entitled to it? Should the state go even further and financially support any parent’s choice to homeschool? Or, conversely, do children have a right to attend a regular school, or at least to have the state exercise greater control over home-based instruction? The following chapters will attempt to answer these questions.

Keywords:   moral entitlement, normative views, rights

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.