Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Conservative InnovatorsHow States Are Challenging Federal Power$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ben Merriman

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780226620282

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2020

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226620459.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 28 September 2021

The Failure of Federal Electoral Oversight and the Emergence of a State Administrative Paradigm of Voter Restriction

The Failure of Federal Electoral Oversight and the Emergence of a State Administrative Paradigm of Voter Restriction

Chapter:
(p.83) Chapter Four The Failure of Federal Electoral Oversight and the Emergence of a State Administrative Paradigm of Voter Restriction
Source:
Conservative Innovators
Author(s):

Ben Merriman

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226620459.003.0004

This chapter examines contemporary policy changes that have made it more difficult to register to vote or cast a ballot. Modern voter restriction arises from an administrative asymmetry. Federal voting rights protections are new and to a great degree judge-made, with little associated investigative or enforcement power. State electoral administrative capacity, by contrast, has grown markedly since the 2000 general election. The centralization of elections administration at the state level has enabled the development of a variety of regulations and administrative practices that make voting more difficult, typically by imposing administrative burdens for individual voters. Such policies have predictably larger effects on poorer voters, older voters, and voters from racial and ethnic minority groups. Yet these policies routinely withstand judicial scrutiny because they are uniformly administered and defended as means of promoting electoral integrity. Through a detailed study of the Crosscheck program, a large multistate record-sharing agreement administered in Kansas, this chapter shows the current legal blind spots and administrative asymmetries effectively authorize practices that may restrict voting without running afoul of voting rights protections. Crosscheck also shows how seemingly trivial policies, in combination, may interact in ways that focus administrative burdens on very specific groups of voters.

Keywords:   election law, voting rights, voter restriction, voter identification, voter registration, conservatism, Crosscheck, administrative burden

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.