Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Agricultural Productivity and Producer Behavior$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Wolfram Schlenker

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780226619804

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2020

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226619941.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 22 September 2021

Willingness to Pay for Low Water Footprint Foods during Drought

Willingness to Pay for Low Water Footprint Foods during Drought

Chapter:
(p.251) 8 Willingness to Pay for Low Water Footprint Foods during Drought
Source:
Agricultural Productivity and Producer Behavior
Author(s):

Hannah Krovetz

Rebecca Taylor

Sofia B. Villas-Boas

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226619941.003.0008

In the context of recent California drought years, we investigate whether consumers are willing to pay for more efficient water usage in the production of four crops. We implement an internet survey choice experiment for avocados, almonds, lettuce, and tomatoes to elicit consumer valuation for water efficiency via revealed choices. We estimate a model of consumer choices where a product is defined as a bundle of three attributes: price, production method, and water usage. Varying the attribute space presented to consumers in the experimental choice design provides the data variation to estimate a discrete choice model—both conditional Logit specifications and random coefficient mixed Logit specifications. We find consumers have a significant positive marginal utility towards water-efficiency and estimate an average implied willingness to pay (WTP) of about 12 cents per gallon of water saved. Moreover, informing consumers about the drought severity increases the WTP for low water footprint options, but not significantly. We find there is heterogeneity in the WTP along respondents’ education, race, and with respect to stated environmental concern. Simulations of removing low water footprint labels from the choice set attributes imply significant consumer surplus losses, especially for white, more educated, and more environmentally concerned respondents.

Keywords:   choice experiments, discrete choice model, tandom coefficient mixed logit, willingness to pay, labels, information, water footprint, food production, California agriculture, counterfactual policy simulations

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.