Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Faking LibertiesReligious Freedom in American-Occupied Japan$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jolyon Baraka Thomas

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780226618791

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2019

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226618968.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 03 December 2021

Domestic Problems, Diplomatic Solutions

Domestic Problems, Diplomatic Solutions

Chapter:
(p.75) 3 Domestic Problems, Diplomatic Solutions
Source:
Faking Liberties
Author(s):

Jolyon Baraka Thomas

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226618968.003.0004

In the 1910s and 1920s, Japanese representatives had to prove time and again that their country had truly embraced religious freedom. One problem was that a journalistic trope of “Mikadoism” (emperor worship) dominated anglophone media just as racial tensions were rising around the massive emigrations of Japanese contract laborers to the American west coast and Hawai‘i. Another problem arose when world leaders responded to Japan's proposal to include a racial equality clause in the League of Nations charter by suggesting that the equality proposal was antithetical to religious freedom. Against this tense diplomatic backdrop, Japanese Buddhists in Hawai‘i confronted challenges related to rights and race, land and labor. Because Buddhists ran language schools for second-generation Japanese children and regularly supported Japanese laborers in conflicts with plantation bosses, members of Hawai‘i’s white landowning class called for the eradication of the language schools as hotbeds of seditious ideology. Buddhists defended themselves in print by appealing to the American ideal of religious freedom, and they even won a supreme court case on the language school issue in 1927 (Farrington v. Tokushige). Yet the decision made no mention of religion, revealing that Japanese Americans remained largely unable to benefit from America's religious freedom guarantee.

Keywords:   religious freedom, Buddhism, Imamura Yemyō, mikadoism, immigration, language schools, Japanese Americans, diplomacy

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.