Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Faking LibertiesReligious Freedom in American-Occupied Japan$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jolyon Baraka Thomas

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9780226618791

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2019

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226618968.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 26 January 2022

Who Needs Religious Freedom?

Who Needs Religious Freedom?

Chapter:
(p.49) 2 Who Needs Religious Freedom?
Source:
Faking Liberties
Author(s):

Jolyon Baraka Thomas

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226618968.003.0003

Japanese Buddhists developed sophisticated interpretations of religious freedom in response to three pressing legal issues in the late nineteenth century. First, a controversial decision concerning chaplaincy at the Sugamo Prison in northern Tokyo led Buddhists to decry Christians' ability to benefit from the constitutional religious freedom guarantee. Second, the prospect of "mixed residence" with foreign Christians, a result of bilateral treaty revisions long sought by the Japanese government, led Buddhists to advance the idea of making Buddhism Japan's sole "officially recognized religion" (kōninkyō). Finally, an 1899 executive branch attempt to pass comprehensive religions legislation elicited strident responses from Buddhists skeptical of the cabinet's interpretation of the meaning and scope of religious freedom. Buddhists generally agreed that they needed cutting-edge theories of religious freedom to press their case with the state, but they disagreed vehemently with one another about which interpretations worked best. As Buddhist interest groups vied with one another over differing conceptions of political supremacy and legal legitimacy, they generated competing understandings of religious freedom as political norm and apologetic tactic. These statist, corporatist, and civil libertarian interpretations of religious freedom deeply influenced later debates over Japanese politics and the social roles of religions.

Keywords:   religious freedom, customary rights, officially recognized religion, mixed residence, legislation, civil rights, statism, corporatism, latitudinarianism

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.