Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Sovereignty and the SacredSecularism and the Political Economy of Religion$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert A. Yelle

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780226585451

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2019

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226585628.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 03 August 2021

The Ambivalence of the Sovereign Ban: The Homo Sacer and the Biblical Ḥerem

The Ambivalence of the Sovereign Ban: The Homo Sacer and the Biblical Ḥerem

Chapter:
(p.74) 3 The Ambivalence of the Sovereign Ban: The Homo Sacer and the Biblical Ḥerem
Source:
Sovereignty and the Sacred
Author(s):

Robert A. Yelle

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226585628.003.0004

Chapter 3 engages with Giorgio Agamben’s argument that sovereignty is disclosed most directly through the ban, which places someone outside or beyond the law. His chief example is the ancient Latin figure of the homo sacer (literally, the “sacred man”), a condemned criminal who, having lost all rights, may be killed with impunity. Whereas earlier theorists regarded the homo sacer as an example of the ambivalence of the sacred— of the convergence of the pure and the polluted in a single category— Agamben argues that this figure should be interpreted not as a sacrifice, but as proof that the sovereign power to place someone under the ban is more primordial than the sacred. Juxtaposing another case of the ban, the biblical herem by which individual victims and entire cities were consecrated to destruction, this chapter contests Agamben’s interpretation of the ban, and his rejection of the idea of the ambivalence of the sacred, while developing his insights to interpret the Exodus and the Conquest of Canaan as moments of sovereign appropriation, where the “outside” and “inside” of the polity— the law- breaking and law- making functions— become indistinguishable.

Keywords:   Giorgio Agamben, homo sacer, herem, ban, sacrifice, sacred, Rudolf Otto, Conquest of Canaan, taboo, violence

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.