Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Shaping Phonology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Diane Brentari and Jackson L. Lee

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780226562452

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2019

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226562599.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 08 April 2020

Model Selection and Phonological Argumentation

Model Selection and Phonological Argumentation

Chapter:
(p.234) Eleven Model Selection and Phonological Argumentation
Source:
Shaping Phonology
Author(s):

ames Kirby

Morgan Sonderegger

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226562599.003.0011

Statistical and empirical methods are in widespread use in present-day phonological research. Researchers are often interested in the problem of model selection, or determining whether or not a particular term in a model is statistically significant, in order to make a judgement about whether or not that term is theoretically significant. If a term is not significant, it is often tempting to conclude that it is not relevant. However, such inferences require an assessment of statistical power, a dimension independent from significance. Assessing power is more difficult than assessing significance because it depends on factors including the true (or expected) effect size, sample size, and degree of noise. In this paper, we provide a non-technical introduction to the issue of power, illustrated with simulations based on experimental investigations of incomplete neutralization, to illustrate how not all null results are equally informative. In particular, depending on the statistical power, a non-significant result can either be uninformative, or reasonably interpreted as providing evidence consistent with a small or zero effect.

Keywords:   power, model selection, significance, null result, effect size, incomplete neutralization

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.