Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Human Body in the Age of CatastropheBrittleness, Integration, Science, and the Great War$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Stefanos Geroulanos and Todd Meyers

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780226556451

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2019

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226556628.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 31 July 2021

The Visible and the Invisible: The Rise and Operationalization of Case Studies, 1915−1919

The Visible and the Invisible: The Rise and Operationalization of Case Studies, 1915−1919

Chapter:
(p.78) 3 The Visible and the Invisible: The Rise and Operationalization of Case Studies, 1915−1919
Source:
The Human Body in the Age of Catastrophe
Author(s):

Stefanos Geroulanos

Todd Meyers

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226556628.003.0003

This chapter analyzes the “case study” during and after WWI as a narrative, analytical, administrative, and hermeneutic device crucial to the narrativization of war neuroses, neurological damage, and physiological disorder. Case histories, already a psychiatric, criminological, and medical device, proliferated during the war. We offer a historically-informed theory of the case study and its uses, and we focus on studies reported by W.H.R. Rivers, Charles S. Myers, E.E. Southard, René Leriche, and Adhémar Gelb and Kurt Goldstein, because they adopted the case study method in different ways a tool for researchers to understand the effects of uncategorizable war wounds. Case studies thus aided in bureaucratic administration as much as individualized care. Thus, Myers tried to divide patients into straightforward categories despite the great complexity of their individual scenarios. Southard collected thousands of case studies on shock, drawing material from records in Germany, France, England, and the US to aid in the clustering of symptoms and an aggregative organization of disease. Gelb and Goldstein, for their part, began presenting case studies toward the end of the war, emphasizing the individuality of his patients and his focus on practices of interpreting “performances” and caring for “individuals” rather than wounds or types.

Keywords:   administration, categorization, case history, clinical care, Kurt Goldstein, Arthur Hurst, Charles S. Myers, René Leriche, W. H. R. Rivers, E. E. Southard, psychiatry, rehabilitation, shell shock

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.