Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Same Sex, Different PoliticsSuccess and Failure in the Struggles over Gay Rights$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gary Mucciaroni

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780226544083

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226544106.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 12 June 2021

Defining the Threats from Gay Rights

Defining the Threats from Gay Rights

Chapter:
(p.48) 2 Defining the Threats from Gay Rights
Source:
Same Sex, Different Politics
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226544106.003.0002

This chapter examines how opponents and proponents define gay rights issues. How opponents define the issues reveals what they find most threatening about gay rights and what they believe the public will find most threatening. In deciding how to frame issues in their effort to arouse perceptions of threat, gay rights opponents can argue that homosexuality violates moral and religious principles, that gay rights will produce undesirable consequences for society, or that the adoption of such measures violates important procedural norms and harms institutions. The chapter is organized as follows. The first part discusses the advantages and disadvantages of defining issues in moral terms versus consequences or procedures. The next section presents data about how opponents define the issues and looks for patterns across issues. Opponents define issues in ways that are consistent with changes in public opinion and the constraints they face in building coalitions. Contrary to theories of “morality politics,” opponents usually do not place primary emphasis on moral and religious arguments in debate but emphasize consequences and the procedural aspects of issues. The conclusion addresses the implications of these findings.

Keywords:   gay rights issues, opponents, proponents, homosexuality, public opinion, morality politics, consequences

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.