Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Confronting TortureEssays on the Ethics, Legality, History, and Psychology of Torture Today$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Scott A. Anderson and Martha C. Nussbaum

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780226529387

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226529554.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 26 January 2022

US Torture of Prisoners of War in Historical Perspective: The Role of Delegitimization

US Torture of Prisoners of War in Historical Perspective: The Role of Delegitimization

Chapter:
(p.120) Chapter 6 US Torture of Prisoners of War in Historical Perspective: The Role of Delegitimization
Source:
Confronting Torture
Author(s):

Christopher J. Einolf

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226529554.003.0007

This chapter looks at US willingness to use torture as a means of combat, and the conditions under which its leaders and soldiers have thought torture legitimate. Prior to the US’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, American soldiers used torture in only two previous international conflicts: the Philippine-American War of 1899-1902 and the Vietnam War. There are several similarities between these historical conflicts and recent ones that may explain why torture has been more readily used in them. These include racism toward the enemy, allowing for its dehumanization; the fact that these were all counterinsurgency wars, which makes torture more useful; and the enemy’s disrespect for the laws of war, leading to the possibility of delegitimizing their status as soldiers. The current War on Terror resembles these earlier conflicts in many respects, but is exceptional in that US officials declared the enemy to be illegitimate and ordered the use of torture. To prevent future torture, this chapter recommends taking the moral reasoning of soldiers seriously, and urges us to come up with arguments against torture that soldiers will recognize as valid. It also suggests changing international law to help soldiers see such law as relevant and fair.

Keywords:   delegitimization, history of torture, international law, Philippine-American War of 1899-1902, racism, soldiers, torture, US history, Vietnam War, War on Terror

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.