Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Legacies of Losing in American Politics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jeffrey K. Tulis and Nicole Mellow

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780226515298

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226515465.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 04 August 2021

Founding

Founding

The Anti-Federal Appropriation

Chapter:
(p.29) 2 Founding
Source:
Legacies of Losing in American Politics
Author(s):

Jeffrey K. Tulis

Nicole Mellow

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226515465.003.0002

There is a perplexing disjunction at the very heart of American politics. Anti-Federalists are most commonly remembered for losing their battle to defeat ratification of the Constitution. Yet an Anti-Federalist interpretation of the Constitution is regularly offered as credible, with deep resonance in American political debate. This is because alleged Federalist ideas are actually Anti-Federalist. This chapter explores the link between the Anti-Federalists’ defeat on the fundamental question of the Constitution and the continued salience of their political project. While Anti-Federalists and Federalists agreed on the type of polity that the Constitution would generate, Anti-Federalists decried these developments as radical and dangerous departures from prevailing practices. To defeat Anti-Federalist opposition, Federalists launched a defense of the proposed Constitution that first sought to reassure the citizenry by minimizing the changes before building a positive case for the very changes they had just denied were being proposed. While this sleight of hand helped to secure ratification, it also licensed the appropriation of defensive Federalist rhetoric and the subversion of the political logic of the Constitution by post-ratification Anti-Federalists and their, sometimes unknowing, political heirs.

Keywords:   Anti-Federalists, The Federalist, political logic, appropriation, subversion

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.