Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Looking ForwardPrediction and Uncertainty in Modern America$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jamie L. Pietruska

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226475004

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226509150.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 23 October 2021

Cotton Guesses

Cotton Guesses

Chapter:
(p.27) Chapter 1 Cotton Guesses
Source:
Looking Forward
Author(s):

Jamie L. Pietruska

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226509150.003.0002

This chapter examines contests over cotton yield forecasting that began during the American Civil War, when the US Department of Agriculture began to produce agricultural statistics in an attempt to stabilize commodity markets and protect farmers from market-manipulating speculators. It describes how the government’s crop reporting system, which relied on statisticians and local volunteer crop correspondents, calculated figures on current acreage and crop condition, which speculators converted into yield forecasts. The chapter focuses on the volatile cotton economy of the 1890s, when the USDA’s crop reports circulated alongside the competing yield estimates of controversial British cotton forecaster Henry M. Neill and Georgia’s Cotton Growers’ Protective Association. The chapter demonstrates that the multiplicity of competing cotton yield forecasts resulted in more, not less, uncertainty in early-twentieth-century cotton markets, and ensuing debates over objectivity and accuracy in agricultural statistics led government officials to redefine crop estimating as a statistically uncertain endeavor.

Keywords:   cotton yield forecasting, crop reports, estimates, agricultural statistics, objectivity, markets, US Department of Agriculture, Henry M. Neill, Cotton Growers' Protective Association

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.