Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Truth MachineThe Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Lynch, Simon A. Cole, and Ruth McNally

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780226498065

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226498089.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 17 September 2021

A Techno-Legal Controversy

A Techno-Legal Controversy

(p.39) Chapter Two A Techno-Legal Controversy
Truth Machine
University of Chicago Press

This chapter reviews a controversy about forensic DNA testing that ran for several years in the late 1980s and early 1990s and which was brought to a head in the legal domain, particularly in contested admissibility hearings in U.S. state and federal courts. The key issue was whether DNA profiling retained its scientific status when it was transferred to the domain of criminal investigation. The most active phases of dispute included nonscientists such as judges and lawyers, as well as scientists and technical specialists from different fields.

Keywords:   forensic DNA testing, admissibility hearings, federal courts, criminal investigation, scientific status

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.