Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Kinaesthetic KnowingAesthetics, Epistemology, Modern Design$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Zeynep Çelik Alexander

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226485201

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226485348.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 29 March 2020

Kinaesthetic Knowing

Kinaesthetic Knowing

The Nineteenth-Century Biography of Another Kind of Knowledge

Chapter:
(p.27) 1: Kinaesthetic Knowing
Source:
Kinaesthetic Knowing
Author(s):

Zeynep Çelik Alexander

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226485348.003.0002

The chapter focuses on the nineteenth-century history of kinaesthetic knowing, starting with Hermann von Helmholtz’s theorization of Kennen, knowledge based on immediate experience, versus Wissen, propositional knowledge. Kinaesthetic knowing promised to resolve the antinomies of Enlightenment frameworks—the mind and the body; mechanism and teleology; induction and deduction, etc.—by positing experience as the first “given” and the foundation of all secure knowledge. This was how psychology, the science of experience, became a key discipline at the end of the century. Psychophysical thinking, invented by G. T. Fechner and transformed into experimental psychology by the likes of Wilhelm Wundt, was to cut through Enlightenment’s intractable dichotomies by correlating form (stimulus) to affect (sensation) without explaining the exact relationship between them. At the end of the century Wilhelm Dilthey went so far as to suggest that a descriptive psychology, anticipating phenomenology, was poised to be the epistemological foundation of all human sciences. While psychological thinking proved influential, the organization of the disciplines at German universities followed the outlines theorized by the neo-Kantian Wilhelm Windelband, who rejected the possibility of a science that was not subject to the mediation of the mind, thus casting psychology as just one natural science among others.

Keywords:   Hermann von Helmholtz, G. T. Fechner, Wilhelm Wundt, Wilhelm Dilthey, Wilhelm Windelband, experience, discipline of psychology, psychophysics, phenomenology, neo-Kantianism

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.