Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Democratic ConstitutionExperimentalism and Interpretation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Brian E. Butler

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226474502

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226474649.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 05 April 2020

Epstein, Holmes, and Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence

Epstein, Holmes, and Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence

Chapter:
(p.77) Chapter Four Epstein, Holmes, and Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence
Source:
The Democratic Constitution
Author(s):

Brian E. Butler

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226474649.003.0005

Chapter 4 investigates the issue of “regulatory takings” through an investigation of Oliver Wendell Holmes’ foundational case, Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, Antonin Scalia’s Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council and the takings theory of Richard Epstein. Epstein’s theory, a key theory for the modern resurrection of takings jurisprudence, is outlined and utilized as an example of formalist and deductivist legal reasoning. Epstein emphasizes the importance of bright-line rules and critiques Holmes’ Mahon “matter of degree” style of reasoning as incoherent and theoretically weak. As opposed to this, the argument offered in the chapter critiques Epstein’s assumptions, showing them to be empirically and formally weak. Indeed, his argument is only as strong as every link in his argument, and many of the links are controversial and easy to dispute. In contrast, the basic reasoning shown in Holmes’ opinion exemplifies a stronger braided style of argument as Peirce advocated for.

Keywords:   Holmes, Scalia, Epstein, takings, Mahon, Lucas, formalist

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.