Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Democratic ConstitutionExperimentalism and Interpretation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Brian E. Butler

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226474502

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226474649.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 06 April 2020

The Democratic Challenge to Constitutional Law

The Democratic Challenge to Constitutional Law

Chapter:
(p.4) Chapter One The Democratic Challenge to Constitutional Law
Source:
The Democratic Constitution
Author(s):

Brian E. Butler

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226474649.003.0002

This chapter identifies and critiques a dominant explanation for judicial supremacy in constitutional law. This theory, the “protection from the tyranny of the majority” story, is examined in the form offered by Erwin Chemerinsky. Importantly, while Chemerinsky holds to this theory, his analysis actually highlights the failure of the United States Supreme Court to live up to the theory through a long list of antiprecedents. The chapter offers an alternate possibility, that of “popular constitutionalism,” as a critique of the narrow perspective offered by protection from majority theories of constitutional law. Ultimately, through an analysis of the pragmatism of John Dewey and an outline of Charles Sanders Peirce’s ways of fixation of belief, the chapter ends by proposing the construction of a democratic and experimental conception of constitutional law labelled “democratic experimentalism.” This conception is described as “law as a democratic means.” Law as a democratic means utilizes an experimental manner of reasoning that entails democratic community. This, in turn, better satisfies Dewey’s demand that democratic aims can only be properly pursued through democratic means.

Keywords:   Chemerinsky, constitutional law, democratic experimentalism, pragmatism, popular constitutionalism, judicial supremacy, Dewey, Peirce

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.