- Title Pages
- [UNTITLED]
- National Bureau of Economic Research
-
Introduction
-
1. Why Was Rate and Direction So Important? -
Some Features of Research by Economists on Technological Change Foreshadowed by The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity
-
The Economics of Inventive Activity over Fifty Years
-
1 Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure, and the Public-Private Portfolio -
2. The Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge across Time and Space: Evidence from Professional Transitions for the Superstars of Medicine -
3. The Effects of the Foreign Fulbright Program on Knowledge Creation in Science and Engineering -
4 Schumpeterian Competition and Diseconomies of Scope: Illustrations from the Histories of Microsoft and IBM -
5 How Entrepreneurs Affect the Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity -
6. Diversity and Technological Progress -
7 Competition and Innovation: Did Arrow Hit the Bull's Eye? -
8 Did Plant Patents Create the American Rose? -
9 The Rate and Direction of Invention in the British Industrial Revolution: Incentives and Institutions -
10 The Confederacy of Heterogeneous Software Organizations and Heterogeneous Developers: Field Experimental Evidence on Sorting and Worker Effort -
The Innovation Fetish among the Economoi: Introduction to the Panel on Innovation Incentives, Institutions, and Economic Growth
-
Innovation Process and Policy: What Do We Learn from New Growth Theory?
-
11 The Consequences of Financial Innovation: A Counterfactual Research Agenda -
12 The Adversity/Hysteresis Effect: Depression-Era Productivity Growth in the US Railroad Sector -
13 Generality, Recombination, and Reuse -
The Art and Science of Innovation Policy: Introduction
-
Putting Economic Ideas Back into Innovation Policy
-
Why Is It So Difficult to Translate Innovation Economics into Useful and Applicable Policy Prescriptions?
-
Can the Nelson-Arrow Paradigm Still Be the Beacon of Innovation Policy?
- Contributors
- Author Index
- Subject Index
Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure, and the Public-Private Portfolio
Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure, and the Public-Private Portfolio
- Chapter:
- (p.51) 1 Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure, and the Public-Private Portfolio
- Source:
- The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited
- Author(s):
Joshua S. Gans
Fiona Murray
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
This chapter takes a conceptual look at the issues associated with funding academic research. It begins with a paradox: when agencies funding scientific research emphasize basic research over translational projects, they are criticized for their impracticality, but when they emphasize near-term mission-oriented R&D projects, they are criticized for crowding out what industry would have done otherwise and backing redundant efforts. A model in which the supply of and demand for public funds plays out in a world where private funding sources also exist is presented. The choices regarding funding sources—and the impact of publicly imposed requirements around disclosure—will vary not only with the scientific merit of the research proposal, but also with the immediacy of its applicability to commercial uses. The chapter gives a fresh insight into the subtle ways that public and private funding interact, and the role that government policy (e.g., mandating openness) plays in shaping the production and use of knowledge.
Keywords: scientific research, private funding, research proposal, public–private portfolio, funding
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
- Title Pages
- [UNTITLED]
- National Bureau of Economic Research
-
Introduction
-
1. Why Was Rate and Direction So Important? -
Some Features of Research by Economists on Technological Change Foreshadowed by The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity
-
The Economics of Inventive Activity over Fifty Years
-
1 Funding Scientific Knowledge: Selection, Disclosure, and the Public-Private Portfolio -
2. The Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge across Time and Space: Evidence from Professional Transitions for the Superstars of Medicine -
3. The Effects of the Foreign Fulbright Program on Knowledge Creation in Science and Engineering -
4 Schumpeterian Competition and Diseconomies of Scope: Illustrations from the Histories of Microsoft and IBM -
5 How Entrepreneurs Affect the Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity -
6. Diversity and Technological Progress -
7 Competition and Innovation: Did Arrow Hit the Bull's Eye? -
8 Did Plant Patents Create the American Rose? -
9 The Rate and Direction of Invention in the British Industrial Revolution: Incentives and Institutions -
10 The Confederacy of Heterogeneous Software Organizations and Heterogeneous Developers: Field Experimental Evidence on Sorting and Worker Effort -
The Innovation Fetish among the Economoi: Introduction to the Panel on Innovation Incentives, Institutions, and Economic Growth
-
Innovation Process and Policy: What Do We Learn from New Growth Theory?
-
11 The Consequences of Financial Innovation: A Counterfactual Research Agenda -
12 The Adversity/Hysteresis Effect: Depression-Era Productivity Growth in the US Railroad Sector -
13 Generality, Recombination, and Reuse -
The Art and Science of Innovation Policy: Introduction
-
Putting Economic Ideas Back into Innovation Policy
-
Why Is It So Difficult to Translate Innovation Economics into Useful and Applicable Policy Prescriptions?
-
Can the Nelson-Arrow Paradigm Still Be the Beacon of Innovation Policy?
- Contributors
- Author Index
- Subject Index