Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Beyond IdeologyPolitics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U. S. Senate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Frances E. Lee

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780226470740

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470771.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 20 October 2019

Agreeing to Disagree, or Disagreeing to Agree

Agreeing to Disagree, or Disagreeing to Agree

Agenda Content and Rising Partisanship

Chapter:
(p.162) Chapter Seven Agreeing to Disagree, or Disagreeing to Agree
Source:
Beyond Ideology
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226470771.003.0007

Ideology does not matter in congressional politics only insofar as individual members have personal beliefs that lead them to take predictable positions. Both Democrats and Republicans have an interest in focusing debate on issues that unify their party internally and that distinguish them from the opposition. This chapter examines variation in the presence of ideological issues on the Senate agenda. It argues that the strengthening of the parties as teams has helped to focus the legislative agenda on questions of ideology that most reliably distinguish between the parties. Much of the increase in Senate party conflict between 1981 and 2004 can be attributed to changes in the content of the Senate agenda. The types of ideological issues that caused the most division and partisanship in earlier periods became progressively more pronounced on the congressional agenda. Meanwhile, those issues that often triggered party conflict in earlier periods represented a smaller share of the agenda. In other words, changes in the content of the Senate agenda promoted higher levels of partisan voting.

Keywords:   ideology, Senate, legislative agenda, party conflict, partisanship, partisan voting, Republicans, congressional agenda

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.