Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Richard B. Freeman and Hal Salzman

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780226468334

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2018

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 26 June 2022

Career Plans of Undergraduate Engineering Students

Career Plans of Undergraduate Engineering Students

Characteristics and Contexts

Chapter:
(p.49) 2 Career Plans of Undergraduate Engineering Students
Source:
U.S. Engineering in a Global Economy
Author(s):

Shannon K. Gilmartin

anthony lising antonio

Samantha R. Brunhaver

Helen L. Chen

Sheri D. Sheppard

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226468471.003.0003

This chapter examines undergraduate engineering students’ career plans, and the environments and experiences that influence their intentions to enter the engineering profession. We augment survey data collected from over 2,000 engineering students with data from three national sources. Our results indicate, first, that a substantial majority of engineering students are not committed to an exclusively engineering career. Second, students with engineering focused plans have distinctive profiles compared with their peers; namely, they are more likely to major in civil/environmental engineering, report higher intrinsic motivation to study engineering, have higher levels of involvement in their coursework, and have lower levels of professional/interpersonal confidence. Third, one’s expected engineering salary modestly differentiates engineering focused students from non-engineering focused ones. Finally, institutional characteristics are associated with students’ engineering career plans, and socioeconomic background may influence plans through the types of institutions at which higher and lower SES students differentially enroll. Implications for educational research and practice are discussed.

Keywords:   engineering education, engineering student career plans, early career pathway, multi-level modeling, URM women, socioeconomic background, between-major differences, engineering labor market, institutional characteristics

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.