Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Making Failure PayFor-Profit Tutoring, High-Stakes Testing, and Public Schools$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jill P. Koyama

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780226451732

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226451756.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 17 November 2019

Framing Failure: Interrogating Policy Studies, Policy Theory, and NCLB

Framing Failure: Interrogating Policy Studies, Policy Theory, and NCLB

Chapter:
(p.25) 2 Framing Failure: Interrogating Policy Studies, Policy Theory, and NCLB
Source:
Making Failure Pay
Author(s):

Jill P. Koyama

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226451756.003.0002

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) persists in the social construction (and social judgments) of “disadvantaged” children, the policy's target population, and furthers a particular presentation of the popular and enduring “faith in using schools as a lever of social progress” for those categorized as most needy—i.e., poor minority children. NCLB represents the surface expression of deep histopolitical, sociocultural, and ideological discourses in American education that cast poor minority students as failing (and therefore deviant) and in need of government intervention. It is built upon a reform foundation that increasingly includes corporations' interests and market-based solutions premised on the assumption that America's public school system needs outside intervention. NCLB's requirement that teachers demonstrate subject matter competence on a test in each subject matter has rendered many highly accomplished teachers “unqualified.” The ongoing multiplicity of educational reforms in New York serve as a reminder of the continual flow of actions, the movement of actors, the temporary associations, and the localization in policy appropriation. Thus, focusing only on face-to-face interactions cannot adequately capture the appropriation of NCLB and the ways in which it affects school failure.

Keywords:   educational reforms, social progress, ideological discourses, America's public schools, school failure

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.