Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Partisans and PartnersThe Politics of the Post-Keynesian Society$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Josh Pacewicz

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780226402550

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226402727.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 30 July 2021

What Regular People Think

What Regular People Think

Chapter:
(p.226) Eight What Regular People Think
Source:
Partisans and Partners
Author(s):

Josh Pacewicz

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226402727.003.0009

This chapter shows how community changes impact residents’ political reasoning and develops a new typology of contemporary American voters. The chapter characterizes the book’s findings as indicative of a shift from partisan politics embedded in community governance (organizational overlap between community and party leaders) to partisan politics disembedded from community governance (separation and antagonism between community and party leaders). The chapter then reprises arguments about peoples’ tendency to use community institutions as a heuristic for understanding partisan politics and draws on a panel of interviews with 104 people in both cities to illustrate that people respond to changes in their community’s public sphere in one of three ideal-typical ways: as traditional voters, partners, and partisans. Traditional voters are effectively living in the past, see community life as a labor-business struggle, and identify with one community side and a party by extension. Partners perceive a community-politics tension and disaffiliate from politics, which they see as excessively divisive and devoid of partnership. Partisans criticize changes in their community and look to politics as panacea, often embracing populist, fringy, and hyper-partisan movements like the Tea Party.

Keywords:   public sphere, political preference formation, political heuristics, tea party

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.