Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Collective Memory and the Historical Past$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jeffrey Andrew Barash

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780226399157

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226399294.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 15 September 2019

Thresholds of Personal Identity and Public Experience

Thresholds of Personal Identity and Public Experience

Chapter:
Chapter 3 Thresholds of Personal Identity and Public Experience
Source:
Collective Memory and the Historical Past
Author(s):

Jeffrey Andrew Barash

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226399294.003.0004

This chapter aims to situate the "place" of remembered experience that has fallen into oblivion. In highlighting the modes of latency and of forgetting at the different personal, small group, and public levels, it draws on reflections notably from the works of Locke and Leibniz, Proust and Freud. On this basis, it interprets the unique status of collective remembrance in the public sphere, above all through identification of the specific modes of inadvertence, opacity, and oblivion lying beyond the scope of what is acknowledged to be publicly significant communal recollection. In the context of contemporary mass societies, this predicament is favored by the complexity and diffuseness of the public sphere that separates it from the direct experience and remembrance of individuals and small groups. Here forgetfulness and oblivion on a public scale, which are easily reinforced by ideological interests, highlight the principle paradox that the discourse of collective memory elicits: on one hand, group remembrance serves as a primary vehicle for political identification; on the other hand, the events on which remembrance focuses become ever more elusive as concrete contents of representation. It is this paradox that the present analysis seeks to elucidate.

Keywords:   involuntary memory, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, John Locke, Marcel Proust, latent memory, forgetting, Henri Bergson, psychoanalysis

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.