Antitrust Merger Policy Lessons from the Australian Experience
Antitrust Merger Policy Lessons from the Australian Experience
This chapter addresses the following question: If a nation is contemplating antitrust merger policy, does the experience of Australia offer any guidance as to how value might be maximized? In drawing on Australia's experience, it focuses on the success of Australian policy in distinguishing between mergers that enhance efficiency and mergers that enhance monopoly power. Two criteria are necessary for antitrust merger policy to enhance value. First, the criteria for assessing mergers should direct the regulators or the courts to allow those mergers that promote economic efficiency and to disallow those mergers that promote monopoly power. Second, the process of assessment should be able to be conducted in a way that maintains confidentiality (until the merger is made public by the firms involved) and is speedy. The chapter explains the formal processes of Australian antitrust merger policy and how it performs against these twin sets of criteria. Two commentaries are also included at the end of the chapter.
Keywords: Australia, antitrust merger policy, efficiency, monopoly
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.