Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Mood, Aspect, Modality RevisitedNew Answers to Old Questions$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Joanna Blaszczak, Anastasia Giannakidou, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska, and Krzysztof Migdalski

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780226363523

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2017

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226363660.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 29 May 2020

Epistemic Future and Epistemic MUST: Nonveridicality, Evidence, and Partial Knowledge

Epistemic Future and Epistemic MUST: Nonveridicality, Evidence, and Partial Knowledge

Chapter:
(p.75) Chapter Three Epistemic Future and Epistemic MUST: Nonveridicality, Evidence, and Partial Knowledge
Source:
Mood, Aspect, Modality Revisited
Author(s):

Alda Giannakidou

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226363660.003.0003

This chapter contributes new evidence from Greek and Italian showing that the future tense, despite its name, does not belong to the notional category of tense. They analyze Greek and Italian future morphemes as modal operators, with the force of necessity, and with the ability to associate with both metaphysical and epistemic modal bases, thus resulting in future and epistemic readings respectively. In Greek and in Italian, future morphemes can be used with purely epistemic readings. The authors define the category epistemic future. They then address the issue of weakness of future and must, and argue that there are two dimensions of weakness. The first has to do with nonveridicality. The so-called evidential component of must, therefore, is merely a reflex of the fact that it does not entail knowledge of p. At the same time, The authors argue that universal modals are biased. All modals that come with ordering sources are biased, therefore stronger than mere possibility modals. This analysis renders universal epistemic modals both strong (because they are biased) and weak (because they are nonveridical). Regarding the future, it becomes clear that the future as a notional category of tense is redundant.

Keywords:   Greek, Italian, future tense, epistemic future

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.