Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
"Red Revolution, Green Revolution"Scientific Farming in Socialist China$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Sigrid Schmalzer

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780226330150

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2016

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226330297.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 21 October 2019

Agricultural Science and the Socialist State

Agricultural Science and the Socialist State

Chapter:
(p.27) 1 Agricultural Science and the Socialist State
Source:
"Red Revolution, Green Revolution"
Author(s):

Sigrid Schmalzer

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226330297.003.0002

The dominant historical narrative of science in the People's Republic of China charts a pendulum-like alternation between "radical," anti-science periods and "moderate," pro-science periods. This chapter moves away from that narrative to focus on a set of questions that promote a fuller understanding of the political significance of agricultural science for the state, and the significance of the state in agricultural science. Agricultural science, and specifically the philosophy and practice of agricultural extension, had a deep historical relationship with state policy and ideology. The central tensions found in agricultural science policy resonated with the broader tensions of the socialist Chinese state as its leaders strove to resolve dilemmas related both to internal political and economic conditions and to the geopolitical contexts of colonialism and the Cold War. These tensions are found in the "point-to-plane" system of policy experimentation and implementation, the tu/yang binary that informed Mao-era politics of science, the emergence of the rural scientific experiment movement from the priorities of both radical and moderate state leaders, and the "three-in-one" epistemology that dominated state writings on agricultural science at the grassroots.

Keywords:   China, state, ideology, agricultural extension, agricultural science, policy, point-to-plane system, scientific experiment movement, tu yang binary, three-in-one epistemology

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.