Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions at FiftyReflections on a Science Classic$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert J. "Richards and Lorraine Daston

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780226317038

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2016

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226317175.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 07 April 2020

Why the Scientific Revolution Wasn’t a Scientific Revolution, and Why It Matters

Why the Scientific Revolution Wasn’t a Scientific Revolution, and Why It Matters

Chapter:
(p.133) Seven Why the Scientific Revolution Wasn’t a Scientific Revolution, and Why It Matters
Source:
Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty
Author(s):

Daniel Garber

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226317175.003.0008

Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions attempts to interpret scientific change on the model of a political revolution: a period of normalcy, followed by a crisis, that is resolved by a new regime, a new paradigm. This essay explores the appropriateness of this model for the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century. When we examine the eclipse of Aristotelian natural philosophy, for a long while, if ever, it was not replaced by a single new paradigm. Rather, the “new” non-Aristotelian philosophy was actually a diverse group of thinkers, the “novatores” or “innovators” who agreed only in the rejection of Aristotelian natural philosophy but otherwise were quite diverse. This is important not only for understanding the historical period, but also because it reveals a flaw in Kuhn’s framework. It is important for political revolutions to be resolved: the stability of the life depends on it. But there is no reason why a scientific revolution needs to result in the adoption of a single new paradigm: in the scientific world, a diversity of competing alternatives, and not Kuhnian normal science may turn out to be the norm.

Keywords:   Thomas Kuhn, Scientific Revolution, paradigm, novatores, Thoephraste Renaudot, Charles Sorel

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.