Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Confronting Aristotle's EthicsAncient and Modern Morality$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Eugene Garver

Print publication date: 2006

Print ISBN-13: 9780226283982

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226284019.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 22 October 2019

Living Politically and Living Rationally: Choosing Ends and Choosing Lives

Living Politically and Living Rationally: Choosing Ends and Choosing Lives

Chapter:
(p.189) Chapter 7 Living Politically and Living Rationally: Choosing Ends and Choosing Lives
Source:
Confronting Aristotle's Ethics
Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226284019.003.0008

Aristotle notoriously ends the Ethics by asking about whether the political or the philosophical life is the best life. Instead of presenting a contest between the active and contemplative lives, he shows how the philosophical life completes the political and practical life; how it is not an alternative to the practical life but its fulfillment. It is the good person, and not the theologian, who truly understands the assertion that people are not the best thing in the universe (NE VI.7.1141a20–21), because only the good person can understand and act on that thesis as a practical truth. These final questions about the best life revive questions raised in Chapter 3 about the relation between virtue and happiness. The virtues, as good conditions of the soul, are what Aristotle in the De Anima calls first energeiai, powerful structures that make possible virtuous activities. Both virtuous activity and happiness are energeiai of the virtues. Therefore the question: How are individual acts of virtue integrated into a virtuous and happy life? Aristotle sees two possibilities for unification: the political life and the philosophical life. In his argument, we never choose between them—we never face the two as alternative options for a practical decision—yet we can see the superiority of the life of contemplation.

Keywords:   Aristotle, Ethics, political life, philosophical life, best life, virtues, happiness, energeiai

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.