Posing a challenge to constructivist and deconstructive approaches in animal studies, Claude Lévi-Strauss, citing Jean-Jacques Rousseau, characterizes the human association with animals as a condition rather than a consequence of symbolic activity. Sensibility accounts for such association by conceptualizing the significance of creaturely voice, while also considering its “public” remediation. Eighteenth-century poetry incorporates impassioned voices and creaturely perspectives into verbal meaning-making at the same time that it identifies its social relevance with its capacity to humanize the reading public. Sensibility’s account of advocacy and sovereign answerability may be contrasted with a liberal contractual politics premised on formal equivalence and the decisionist theory of sovereignty that, for Giorgio Agamben, underlies modern biopolitics. Walter Benjamin’s negative dialectics of “natural history” (Naturgeschichte) provides a method attentive to voice as symbolic remainder, exemplified by his recovery of the onto-theological category of the creature. Sensibility understands the human as a creature whose unique capacities for reflection and responsibility begin in a susceptibility to the signs of others.
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.