Dethroning Grand Theory
Dethroning Grand Theory
This chapter reviews the six constitutional theorists and concludes that they seek a universal method of interpretation that will serve as a strategy for judges faced with any constitutional issue. Grand theorists believe that the rule of law will suffer if judges lack sure theoretical guidance, apart from their overblown anxiety about democratic legitimacy. These theorists reconcile judicial review and majority rule and respond in very different fashions to Learned Hand's fear that judicial review replaces democracy in the reign of philosopher kings. Grand theory can be useful in helping to understand overlooked aspects of constitutional law. It has been such a dominant feature of constitutional scholarship that constitutional scholars are constantly searching for pieces that might be decisive to current legal disputes.
Keywords: constitutional theorists, grand theorists, grand theory, democracy, constitutional scholarship
Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.