Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Contested ReproductionGenetic Technologies, Religion, and Public Debate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John H. Evans

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780226222653

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226222707.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 20 October 2019

Talking about Embryonic Life

Talking about Embryonic Life

Chapter:
(p.56) Chapter Three Talking about Embryonic Life
Source:
Contested Reproduction
Author(s):

John H. Evans

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226222707.003.0003

This chapter is concerned with embryonic life discourse, which is the primary discourse used to oppose abortion in the United States. Embryonic life discourse is important because so many people use it to oppose a range of reproductive genetic technologies (RGTs). The chapter evaluates the possibility of deliberation regarding RGTs across the abortion divide. Surveys by social scientists which include interviewees from liberal religious groups tend to argue that abortion for cystic fibrosis is an acceptable alternative, and members of conservative traditions are less likely to make this case. The discussions with the pro-lifers who only use the embryonic life discourse show how this exclusive use would preclude the merger of the abortion issue with RGTs that do not result in embryonic death. While surveys can be used to evaluate the prevalence and representativeness of discourses in a population, they have limitations. Such a survey only shows that the respondent uses these discourses for RGTs in general. It cannot show which RGT they are using them for, whether they also use them for abortion, or whether these discourses are salient enough that they would use them if they were not prompted by the survey.

Keywords:   embryonic life discourse, abortion, reproductive genetic technologies, survey, embryonic death

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.