Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Contested ReproductionGenetic Technologies, Religion, and Public Debate$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John H. Evans

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780226222653

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: February 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226222707.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 05 April 2020

Introduction

Introduction

Chapter:
(p.1) Chapter One Introduction
Source:
Contested Reproduction
Author(s):

John H. Evans

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226222707.003.0001

There is a revolution under way in how babies come into being that may change the entire society. Reproductive genetic technologies (RGTs) allow parents to influence the genetic qualities of their offspring more precisely than through “normal” fertilization by a sperm and an egg after sex. Currently possible and potential technologies include genetic carrier screening, fetal testing followed by abortion, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, sex-determining sperm sorting, human genetic engineering, and reproductive cloning. The least controversial application of RGTs is to make sure that children do not have deadly childhood diseases such as Tay-Sachs. Embryos are also being screened by couples to make sure their children do not suffer from a strong squint, deafness, or dwarfism. Even technologies long considered to be in the realm of science fiction now appear to be on the horizon. This chapter provides an understanding of opposition to RGTs by inductively examining the reasons people give for their opposition to RGTs. Generally, the religious are opposed to RGTs and the applications of RGTs more than the nonreligious, but a more subtle answer is to identify the characteristics of different RGTs that tend to fall on either side of the moral divide between approval and disapproval.

Keywords:   reproductive genetic technologies, Tay-Sachs, embryos, genetic carrier, religious

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.