Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Other RenaissanceItalian Humanism between Hegel and Heidegger$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Rocco Rubini

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780226186139

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226186276.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 04 June 2020

A Philosopher’s Humanism: Paul Oskar Kristeller

A Philosopher’s Humanism: Paul Oskar Kristeller

Chapter:
Chapter Five (p.293) A Philosopher’s Humanism: Paul Oskar Kristeller
Source:
The Other Renaissance
Author(s):

Rocco Rubini

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226186276.003.0005

This chapter reviews and contextualizes the early career of Paul Oskar Kristeller (1905-1999), the doyen of Renaissance studies in postwar American academia. It details Kristeller’s relationship to his Italian mentor, Giovanni Gentile, and to rival academics during his exile in Italy in the 1930s, as well as his indebtedness to his German mentors and peers. These included Hans Baron, whose epistolary dialogue with Kristeller helped interest the latter in the Renaissance Platonist Marsilio Ficino; Martin Heidegger, who influenced his appreciation for existential concerns; and, especially, Heinrich Rickert, whose brand of Neokantianism was instrumental, the chapter shows, in shaping Kristeller’s influential view of Renaissance humanism as “rhetoric” rather than “philosophy.” The nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century debate concerning the scientific value of the Geisteswissenschaften provides an additional context for Kristeller’s scholarship: this dispute pitted Rickert against the German historicist tradition that runs from Johann Gustav Droysen to Wilhelm Dilthey, and was favored by Eugenio Garin. With this context in mind, the chapter invites a new understanding of the fundamental disagreement between Garin and Kristeller that defined Renaissance studies; it also aims to transcend that disagreement by revealing that the two scholars were united in making Renaissance scholarship a philosophical discourse in its own right.

Keywords:   neokantianism, Marsilio Ficino, Giovanni Gentile, Wilhelm Dilthey, Giuseppe Saitta, Hans Baron, Johann Gustav Droysen, Geisteswissenschaften, Heinrich Rickert, philology

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.