Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Invasive Species in a Globalized WorldEcological, Social, and Legal Perspectives on Policy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Reuben P. Keller, Marc W. Cadotte, and Glenn Sandiford

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780226166049

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226166216.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 28 September 2021

Fish Tales:

Fish Tales:

Optimism and Other Bias in Rhetoric about Exotic Carps in America

Chapter:
(p.72) Chapter Four Fish Tales
Source:
Invasive Species in a Globalized World
Author(s):

Glenn Sandiford

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226166216.003.0004

Invasive species policy is a “trans-scientific” issue, guided by science but ultimately transcending into the realm of opinion and judgment. Since the early nineteenth century, five foreign species of carp have been imported into America — common carp (Cyprinus carpio), grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), black carp ((Mylopharyngodon piceus), silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), and bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) — each of which became invasive. Before, during, and after each introduction, carp advocates replayed a problematic pattern of rhetoric — whether in scientific report, policy statement, or news story — that features excessive optimism, narrow-framed rationales, and revisionism, and which reflects human nature rather than historical context or scientific knowledge. For all five species, traits that boosters initially marketed as positive attributes (fecundity, hardiness, etc.) were later reframed by critics as negatives. Carps have never had significant sustained commercial value in America because of widespread skepticism about their edibility, yet for 130 years defenders of invasive foreign carps have unsuccessfully addressed that unpopularity as a marketing problem that can be overcome by rebranding, recipes, and “education” of the U.S. consumer. The tendency for optimism bias and flawed foresight in advocates’ narratives about exotic species merits greater comprehensiveness and self-awareness in assessments of such biota, especially prior to introduction.

Keywords:   invasive species, rhetoric, trans-scientific, Asian carp, bighead carp, silver carp, common carp, optimism bias

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.