Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Economic Regulation and Its ReformWhat Have We Learned?$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nancy L. Rose

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780226138022

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: January 2015

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226138169.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 26 January 2022

Telecommunications RegulationCurrent Approaches with the End in Sight

Telecommunications RegulationCurrent Approaches with the End in Sight

(p.345) 6 Telecommunications RegulationCurrent Approaches with the End in Sight
Economic Regulation and Its Reform

Nancy L. Rose

University of Chicago Press

The regulatory restructuring of telecommunications markets, beginning with the breakup of AT&T in 1984 and extending to telecommunications markets worldwide, has transformed the telecommunications industry. The rise of cellular (“mobile”) telecommunications in recent years has achieved penetration rates over 80 percent in most industrialized countries, and for many consumers now replaces, rather than supplements, landline service. The spread of competing fiber networks operated by cable companies that offer voice service and broadband service in addition to pay TV has further transformed the competitive telecommunications environment in the US, and may do so in many other countries. This transition is greatly influenced by regulatory policy on mandatory unbundling of network elements, first adopted in the US in the mid-1990s and now used by regulators in most advanced economies. This chapter discusses central issues in deregulation of telephone service, including the prospect of competitive local markets. The chapter focuses on the role of facilities based competition in achieving that outcome. Regulatory impediments to facilities based competition are described, as are conditions under which a jurisdiction could end up with “regulation forever” by creating incentives for new entrants to choose a mandatory unbundling offer rather than investing in their own competing facilities.

Keywords:   telecommunication regulation, mandatory unbundling, economic regulation, deregulation, access pricing, facilities based competition

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.