Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Success and Failure in Limited WarInformation and Strategy in the Korean, Vietnam, Persian Gulf, and Iraq Wars$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Spencer D. Bakich

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780226107684

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226107851.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 19 September 2021

Explaining Strategic Performance in Limited Warfare

Explaining Strategic Performance in Limited Warfare

Chapter:
(p.19) Chapter Two Explaining Strategic Performance in Limited Warfare
Source:
Success and Failure in Limited War
Author(s):

Spencer D. Bakich

Publisher:
University of Chicago Press
DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226107851.003.0002

This chapter establishes the theoretical framework for the book. Initially, the problem of escalation is argued to be central to limited warfare and limited war strategies. Undesired escalation can take in three forms: vertical, horizontal, and durational. Successful limited war strategies are those that effectively balance the military and diplomatic objectives sought. Four possible strategic outcomes are rendered from the interaction of military failure/success and diplomatic failure/success. The chapter argues that successful limited war strategies result from a state's capacities to extract and convert relevant military and diplomatic information into strategy. A state's information institution (i.e., the pattern of information flow among policymakers and national security organizations) is the ultimate source of strategic success and failure. Two alternative explanations of strategic performance in limited war are presented: organizational culture theory and democratic civil-military relations theory. Finally, the hybrid method of typological theory and process tracing is discussed.

Keywords:   Limited war, Escalation, Strategy, Information Institutions, Military, Diplomacy, Organizational culture, Civil-military relations, Typological theory, Process tracing

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.