Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Law in the LaboratoryA Guide to the Ethics of Federally Funded Science Research$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Robert P. Charrow

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780226101644

Published to Chicago Scholarship Online: March 2013

DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226101668.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CHICAGO SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.chicago.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Chicago Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CHSO for personal use.date: 26 May 2022

How Is the “Integrity of Research” Regulated: What Is Research Misconduct?

How Is the “Integrity of Research” Regulated: What Is Research Misconduct?

(p.49) Chapter 3 How Is the “Integrity of Research” Regulated: What Is Research Misconduct?
Law in the Laboratory
University of Chicago Press

This chapter examines what constitutes scientific misconduct and the process that is supposed to be used to separate the guilty from the innocent. The process is examined from four perspectives: those of the person bringing the allegation, the person against whom the allegation is brought, the university officials who received the complaint and invoke the university's process for dealing with allegations of misconduct, and the faculty committee that is appointed to take evidence and resolve the allegations. The chapter is organized as follows. The first section recounts the history of the regulation of research misconduct. The second discusses the federal definition of misconduct, and differentiates between conduct that is misconduct and conduct that may be antisocial but is not misconduct. The third section discusses the actual procedures at the university level for resolving allegations of misconduct from the four perspectives noted above: complainant, target, institution, and faculty committee. The fourth section spells out the procedures at the federal level and discusses the hearing process. Case studies are included at the end of the chapter.

Keywords:   scientific misconduct, universities, faculty, hearings

Chicago Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.